Research paper

 

Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality, Northern State, Sudan

Awadia Ahmed Hashim

 

Department of Agric. Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Dongola, Dongola, Sudan.

Corresponding author: عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.

 

ABSTRACT


 


Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality

 

 

 

تأثيرات تطبيق الحزم التقنية علي إنتاجية محصول القمح بمحليه دنقال ، الوالية الشمالية-السودان

 

عوضية احمد هاشم

 

قسم االقتصاد الزراعى، كلية العلوم الزراعية، جامعة دنقال، السودان

 

هدفت هذه الدراسة لمعرفة تأثيرات تطبيق الحزمة التقنية الموصي بها لمحصول القمح علي اإلنتاجية بمحليه دنقال – الوالية

 

بواسطة استبيان خالل موسم

 

العينة الطبقية العشوائية متعددة المراحل استخدمت لجمع البيانات من  150 مزارع

 

الشمالية.

 

.15/2014 االحصاء الوصفي وتحليل االنحدار استخدم للتحليل. الحزمة التقنية لمحصول القمح تشمل: مواعيد الزراعة ومعدل

 

لمواعيد الحصاد.

 

أضافه

 

وجرعات  سمادي  اليوريا والسيوبرفوسفات

 

التقاوي ونوع  التقاوى وعدد  الريات وازالة  الحشائش

 

اوضحت نتائج الدراسة أن كل المزارعين من الذكور واألغلبية منهم متعلمين واعمارهم في الفئه العمرية النشطة .)45-26( نسبة %45 منهم حجم أسرهم في الفئة 10-5 فردا. اكثر من نصفهم يمتلكون األراضي المزروعة. أكد %68  من المزارعين عدم توفر خدمات اإلرشاد الزراعي و%63 طبقوا معلومات اإلرشاد الزراعي .أوضحت النتائج أن مواعيد الزراعة وعدد

الريات وعمليه النظافة ومواعيد الحصاد هي اكثر العمليات الفالحية الموصي بها تطبيقا .عموما توصلت الدراسة إلي  أن اإلنتاج

العالي للقمح يمكن تحقيقه بتطبيق الحزمة التقنية الموصي بها. كشفت الدراسة أن االلتزام بالحزم التقنية الموصى بها   يزيد

االنتاجية معنويا. وأوصت الدراسة ايضا بتقوية السياسات الزراعية والي تؤدي الي رفع معدالت تبني الحزمة التقنية للمحصول

مثل  دعم الخدمات اإلرشادية معنويا وماديا إضافة إلي دعم سعر مدخالت اإلنتاج.

 

 
   


Awadia Ahmed Hashim / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 3, NO. 1 (2018) 11 - 21

 

 

Introduction

Wheat is one of the most important food crops, originating from the Levant region of the Near East and Ethiopian Highlands, but the crop is now cultivated worldwide and it almost comes the third most-produced cereal after maize and rice, although sometimes come second after maize (Ibrahim, 2009). It is grown on about 220 million hectares worldwide, covering more land area than any other crop (Ahmed, 2008). Major wheat producing countries include China, India, USA, Russia and France (FAO, 2016). Ibrahim (2009) reported that domestically, the Gezira scheme produces about 50% of the country’s wheat production; the rest is produced in the Northern and River Nile States in addition to little areas in Rahad and New Halfa schemes. Production of wheat is insufficient to meet growing needs and imports attempt to cover the deficit because Sudan consumed 2.75 million metric tons of wheat in 2016, and only produced 456000 Tones (ASD, 2016). Table (1) shows the fluctuated planted areas and yields which vary significantly due to weather conditions and other factors. The total currently cultivated areas in Northern State is estimated at 200,000 ha, 75% of which is devoted to winter season crops. However, wheat cultivated areas are about 43% on the average of the total winter cultivated area in the Northern State (Elhori and Babiker, 2009).

According to Rogers (2003), diffusion is a process in which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system, and it occurred between persons, while adoption is a decision made by an individual to make full use of an innovation as the best course of action available. Rogers (1983) defined an innovation as an idea, practice, or object that is perceived by individuals or other units of adoption to be new. He also added that there are four main elements in the diffusion of innovation which includes: the innovation, communication channel, time and the social system. Rogers (2003) reported that the social system as an important element in diffusion of innovation was highlighted in early studies. For example, Linton (1952) reported that if we know what society culture is including in its exact system of values and attitudes, we can predict with a fairly high degree of probability whether that bulk of it welcomes or resists a particular innovation. This statement shows the importance of cultural values on individual innovations.

 

 
   


Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality

 

Table (1): Production of wheat in Sudan during the period 2009/10 - 2015/16

 

Season                  Cultivated area

Yield

Production

 

(1000 ha)

(ton/ha)

(1000 ton)

2009/2010

237

1.70

402.90

2010/2011

196

1.50

294.00

2011/2012

187

1.73

323.51

2012/2013

185

1.51

279.35

2013/2014

137

1.77

242.49

2014/2015

237

2.00

474.00

2015/2016

224

2.04

456.96

Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Northern State

 

Oladele (2005) argued that social scientists investigating farmer’s adoption behavior have accumulated considerable evidence showing that demographic variables, technology characteristics, information sources, knowledge, awareness, attitude, and group influence affect adoption behavior. Rogers (1995) stated that the adoption of innovation is related to innovation decision process through which an individual passes from first knowledge of an innovation, to forming an attitudes towards the innovation, deciding to adopt or reject the innovation, implementing the new ideas, and confirming the innovation decision. Accordingly, Rogers (1995) developed a model that explains the process which consists of five stages that include; awareness, interest, evaluation, trial and adoption stage.

Wheat production in the Northern State faces some problems, some of these are: high inputs prices, inappropriate policies, weakness of the extension services and adoption of technical crop packages. Alnur (2011) stated that the productivity of wheat in the Northern State represented about 40% of that obtained in the research station in Northern state.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of adoption of recommended cultural practices on productivity of wheat in Dongola locality, Northern State, Sudan. This main goal was fulfilled through; investigating the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers and wheat applied cultural practices compared to the recommended technical packages and determining its effects on productivity.

 

 
   


Awadia Ahmed Hashim / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 3, NO. 1 (2018) 11 - 21

Methodology

Data collection method

This study depended mainly on primary data through direct personal interview by structured questionnaire. The survey was conducted at the end of 2014/15 winter season, using a multi stage random sampling technique. About 150 respondents were selected which represented almost 10% of the total wheat farmers in Dongola Locality. Data of farmers age, education level, family size, cultural practices were collected. In addition, secondary data related to the problem investigated were obtained from relevant sources.

Data analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to determine frequency and percentages of socio-economic characteristics of the farmers and regression test used to assess the impact of adoption of the recommended wheat technical packages on productivity. Cobb-Douglass production functions (Heady and Dilon, 1961) were used to meet the objectives of the study:

logY= B0 + B1logX1 + B2logX2 + B3logX3+…+BnlogXn

Where:

 

Y= dependent variable (productivity) B0= intercept

B1-----Bn= regression coefficients

X1-----Xn= independent variables: X1=seed variety, X2= seed rate, X3=sowing date, X4= superphosphate dose, X5= urea dose, X6= no of irrigations, X7= weeding and X8= harvest time. Y= yield (sack/feddan)

Results and Discussion

Many aspects pertinent to the adoption of wheat technical packages in the study area were discussed. These include: socio-economic characteristic of farmers, recommended technical packages of wheat versus actually applied and adoption of wheat technical packages.

The socio-economic characteristics of wheat producers in Dongola Locality

Results revealed that all of the respondents are males. This is one of tradition of the people in the Northern State, farms are owned by males and women contribution is limited compared to other states of Sudan. However, now a day, women start to share in the harvest of all crops especially

 

 
   


Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality

 

the spices crops. Most of farmers are literate and young, this was in conformity with that of Elhori et al. (2017) in their study of economics of wheat production in Northern State, they found that most of the respondent were literate and almost of them are in the active age group (26-45). Rahamtalla (1982) stated that educated farmers adopted the recommended technical packages more than others. Results also showed that 45% of farmers have family size in the range of 5-10 members and that help in farm activities. These results come in line with Salah (1996) who found that most of farmers families were in this range. In addition, more than a half of the farmers (52%) owned their farms. Further, 68% of the investigated farmers mentioned that the extension services were not available and 63% of them used the extension information. These results are similar with that of Ahmed (2008) and Mohamed (2000). Furthermore, 45% of farmers have small farms (5-10 feddans).

Table (2): Socio-economic characteristics of wheat producers in Dongola Locality

Item

No

%

Item

No

%

Sex

Family size

 

 

Male

150

100

Less than 5

57

38

Female

00

00

5-10

68

45

Total

150

100

Above 10

25

17

Age

Total

150

100

Less than 25

7

4.6

Type of holding

26-45

91

60.7

Owned

78

52.0

Above 45

52

34.7

Government

38

25.3

Total

150

100

Rent

23

15.3

Education

Sharing

11

07.3

Illiterate

4

2.7

Total

150

100

Literate

146

97.3

Farm size/fed

Total

150

100

Less than 5

30

20

Application of extension information

5-10

67

45

Yes

95

63.3

Above 10

53

35

No

55

36.7

Total

150

100

Total

150

100

Extension

 

 

 

Available

48

32

 

 

Not available

102

68

 

 

Total

150

100

Source: Field survey (2015)

 

Applied cultural practices of wheat and recommended ones

Application of the technical packages of the crops is important tool in reducing fluctuation of the crops productivities, and in turn increasing farmer’s income.

 

 
   


Awadia Ahmed Hashim / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 3, NO. 1 (2018) 11 - 21

Study field survey revealed that the majority (64%) of the farmers used traditional seeds either from previous season(s) or local markets, and that it may be due to unavailability of the improved seeds. Elhori and Babiker (2009) in their study of the optimum winter cropping pattern in the Northern State suggested that the traditional seeds used contribute to fewer crops productivities. Agricultural Research Station, Dongola (ARSD, 2009) recommended that wheat sowing rate per feddan is 50 kg. The study discovered that 53% of the farmers applied seed rate more than the recommended, 4% less than the recommended and 43% applied the actual recommended seed rate. Further, as per this study, almost half of the farmers (54%) grow wheat at the recommended time, 85 % of the farmers applied eight waterings which is recommended, 47 % of the farmers used the recommended urea dose and only 33% applied the superphosphate dose. Many factors might be responsible for that, the most important of which might be, unavailability and expensive inputs. Further, 76% of the farmers applied the weeding process and 85 % of them harvested their crop in the recommended time.

Table (3): Applied cultural practices of wheat and recommended ones

 

Item

No

%

Productivity

Item

No

%

Productivity

Seed variety

 

 

 

Urea

 

 

 

Recommended

54

36

9.73

Recommended

71

47

9.14

Not recommended

96

64

8..47

Not recommended

79

53

8.70

Total

150

100

-

Total

150

100

 

Seed rate

 

 

 

Superphosphate

 

 

 

Less than recommended

6

4

6.83

Recommended

64

43

9.67

Recommended

49

33

9.98

More than recommended

80

53

7.65

Not recommended

101

67

8.40

Total

150

100

-

Total

150

100

-

Sowing date

 

 

 

Weeding

 

 

 

Recommended

81

54

10.7

Done

114

76

9.44

Not recommended

69

46

7.44

Not-done

36

24

7.23

Total

150

100

 

Total

150

100

 

No irrigation

 

 

 

Harvest time

 

 

 

Recommended

127

85

8.19

Recommended

129

85

9.24

Not recommended

23

15

9.79

Not recommended

21

15

7

Total

150

100

-

Total

150

100

-

Source: Field survey (2015)

 

Wheat production functions in Dongola Locality

Table (4) shows the regression equations for wheat production in Dongola Locality. Results revealed that the adjusted (R2) of the regression function was 0.62, implying that 62% of the total variation in wheat productivity is explained by the explanatory variables in the models. The F-statistics

 

 
   


Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality

 

which was highly significant (0.000) implying that, the independent variables were collectively important in explaining the variation in the dependent variable (wheat productivity). Weeding and period of harvest were positive and highly significant (0.01 and 0.05). This means that a one percent increase of each of the independent variables increases wheat productivity revenues by their corresponding elasticity. The coefficients of seed rate and urea doses were found to be highly significant (0.000 and 01, respectively), but with negative signs. This means that using of over recommended seed rate and over doses of urea negatively affected the productivity and this confirm the findings of Mohammed (2000) who studied the factors affecting wheat productivity in Northern State.

Table (4): Effect of independent variables on wheat productivity

 

Independent variables

Coefficient

t-values

Sig

Consistent

 

6.571

0.000

Seed type

0.188

2.327

0.000

Seed rate

-.121

-1.743

0.021

Sowing date

0.421

5.445

0.053

Superphosphate

0.144

1.968

0.051

Urea

-.201

-2.666

0.009

No of irrigations

0.169

2.405

0.017

Weeding

0.170

2.333

0.021

Harvesting time

0.263

3.777

0.000

R2                                                           0.62

F- ratio 14.23

Source: Field survey (2015)

 

 

Conclusion

Results obtained showed that increasing the production and productivity of wheat depends on applying the recommended cultural practices of the crop. The study suggested strengthening the agricultural policies that lead to increase the rates of adoption of technical package of wheat like enhancing the extension services physically and morally besides subsidizing the prices of agricultural inputs to encourage the farmers to adopt the technical packages for the crops.

 

 
   


Awadia Ahmed Hashim / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 3, NO. 1 (2018) 11 - 21

References

Ahmed, A.A (2008). Economics of wheat production in Dongola Locality, Northern State, M.Sc.

Thesis, University of Dongola, Sudan.

Alnur, A. A. I. (2011). Nutrition gap and wheat. University of Shendi Journal, Vol. (10): pp 171- 177.

ARSD (2009). Agricultural Research Station, Dongola (2009). The seasonal annual report of wheat cultural practices.

ASD (2016). Agricultural Statistics Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Forest (2016). Annual report.

Elhori, A. I. S. and Babiker, B. I. (2009). Optimum winter cropping pattern in the Northern State, Sudan. J. Sc. Tech.: 10(3): pp 77-86.

Elhori, A. I. S.; Mohamed, A. A. A. and Mohamed A. S. (2017). Economics of wheat (Triticum spp.) production in Dongola area, Northern State, Sudan. Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences: 2(1): pp 12-22.

FAO (2016). Food and Agriculture Organization. Italy, Rome. The Annual Statistical Report.

Sudan.

Heady, E.O. and Dilon, J. (1961). Agricultural production functions. Iowa  State  University  Press,  Ames, Iowa, U.S.A.

Ibrahim, T.H (2009). Relationship between farmers personal characteristics and the adoption of some recommended wheat cultural practices in the center group, Gezira Scheme, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Linton, R. (1952). Cultural and personality factors affecting economic growth. In: B.E Hoselitz (ed.) The progress of Underdeveloped Areas. Chicago, University of Chicago press.

Mohammed, A.S. (2000). Economics of crop production in Dongola Province, Northern State, Sudan. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Oladele, O. I. (2005). Atobit analysis of propensity to discontinue adoption of agricultural technology among farmers in Southwestern Nigeria. Journal of Central European Agriculture Vol. No 3

Rahamtalla, B.M. (1982). Some factors affecting economics of production of irrigated cotton in the Sudan, case study of the Elkulut pumps schemes corporation. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovation New York: The Free Press (3rd edition). Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovation New York: The Free Press (4th Edition).

 

 
   


Adoption of Wheat Technical Packages Effects on Productivity in Dongola Locality

 

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation New York: The free press (5th edition).

Salah, B.S (1996). Economics of crop production in Donogla Province. MSc Thesis, University of Khartoum.