Research paper

 

Effect of Some Neem (Azadirachta indica) Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes Anopheles arabiensis Patton

Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig

Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Sinnar, University, Sudan,

Corresponding author: عنوان البريد الإلكتروني هذا محمي من روبوتات السبام. يجب عليك تفعيل الجافاسكربت لرؤيته.

 

 

A B S T R A C T

 

 


Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 2, NO. 1 (2017) 24 - 34

 

 

 

 

 

تــأثير مستخلصات طبيعية من النيم (Azadirachta indica A.juss) على بعوض النوفليس (Anopheles arabiensis Patton)

فتح الرحمن ابراهيم الصديق


قسم وقاية النباتات، كلية الزراعة، جامعة سنار- السودان

 


تم اجراء تجارب معملية في المركز القومي للملاريا بولاية سنار- السودان، لمعرفة تأثير مستخلصات عضوية من اوراق
وجنين بذور النيم ) (Azadirachta indica A. jussعلى أطوار اليرقة والحشرة الكاملة للبعوض الناقل للملاريا بالسودان
(. .)Anopheles arabiensis Pattonتم قياس النشاط القاتل لليرقات، التأثير المانع لوضع البيض، والقاتل للحشرة الكاملة
بعد 24ساعة من التعرض وذلك باستعمال مستخلصات من الايثانول والهكسان للأجزاء المذكورة سابقاً من النيم، تبعاً لمقاييس
منظمة الصحة العالمية. اوضحت النتائج ان جميع المستخلصات المختبرة من اجزاء النيم قد اظهرت تأثير قاتل ليرقات بعوض
الانوفليس، وقد كان مستخلص الهكسان لجنين بذور النيم هو الاكثر تفوقاً على المستخلصات الاخرى معطياً اقل تركيز نصفي
قاتل، بلغ 1998ملجم/ لتر- .1اظهرت المستخلصات تحت الاختبار وبكل التركيزات المستخدمة منها، خصائص مانعة لوضع
البيض، فى حين انها لم تظهر تأثير قاتل يذكر للحشرة الكاملة للباعوض موضوع الدراسة. يمكن ان نخلص من هذا التقصي ان
مستخلصات النيم تحت الدراسة يمكن ان تستخدم بتوافق مع الطرق البيولوجية التقليدية الاخرى في برامج مكافحة البعوض
الناقل للملاريا وذلك بعد التقييم الحقلي، واضعين في الاعتبار الاهتمام العام بتنامي ظاهرة مقاومة النواقل للمبيدات والتأثيرات
البيئية الضارة لها

 


Effect of Some Neem Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes

 

 

Introduction

Mosquito Anopheles arabiensis is one of the most important vectors of malaria in sub-saharan Africa, and it occurs in overlapping manner with other important species (Mabaso, 2004). Control of anopheline mosquito vectors of malaria by using synthetic insecticides has shown greater impact on morbidity and mortality caused by this disease. Regarding that insecticide resistance is widely spread in Africa where it has been associated with the use of insecticides in public health for mosquito control and in agriculture for pest control (Kristan, 2003). In Sudan, although more recent studies indicated that resistant level has increased only marginally (Kamau and Valule, 2006). But there is concern that continued and/or increase use of insecticides may result in increased resistance that would threaten the sustainability of the vector control strategies (Maharaj et al., 2005).

Phytochemicals obtained from plants with proven mosquito control potentials can be used as an alternative to synthetic insecticides or along with them under integrated control programmes. Large number of plant extracts have been used against Anopheles spp. as control agents viz. Calotropis procera (Markouk et al., 2000); Eucalyptus camaledulensis (Yang and Ma, 2005) and Ocimum basilicum (Elsiddig, 2007).

In Sudan, neem Azadirachta indica tree is widely spread and it is found almost in every part of the country. A number of workers studied the effect of the different parts of neem tree on different arthropod pests of crops (Mansour and Salem, 2001; Sati et al., 2003; and Elsiddig, 2009). Nathan et al. (2005) explored the advantages of pure neem limonoids, and study the larvicidal, pupicidal, adulticidal and antiovipositional activity of neem limonoids. Azadirachtin, salannin and deacetylgedunin showed high bioactivity at all doses, while the rest of the neem limonoids were less active, and were only biologically active at high doses. Azadirachtin was the most potent in all experiments and produced almost 100% larval mortality at 1 ppm concentration. Batra et al. (1998) reported that neem oil emulsion in water was found to control breeding of Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles stephensi, and Aedes egypti in pools, basement tanks, and desert coolers. Topical application of 2% neem oil mixed with coconut oil produced varying degree of protection against different vector species (Moore et al., 2003).

The present study was carried to test the potentials of different neem organic extracts against Anopheles arabiensis larvae, and to evaluate their oviposition deterrency and mortality on adults.

 

 
   


Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 2, NO. 1 (2017) 24 - 34

 

Materials and Methods Study area

Experiments were carried out at the National Malaria Centre, Sinnar- Sinnar State-Sudan.

Preparation and extraction of the plant material

Fresh leaves of neem Azadirachta indica were collected from Shambat campus, Sudan University of Science and Technology, dried under shade for 10 days, and then powdered to a uniform mesh. However, ripe fruits of the plant were harvested from the same area and soaked in water to remove pulps. The obtained seeds were dried under shade for 10 days. The well dried seeds were decorticated to obtain the kernel separately, which powdered to a uniform mesh. Extraction was done for the two prepared parts at the Department of Pesticides Alternatives of the Environmental and Natural Research Institute-Sudan, using soxhlet extractor, firstly with hexane and then with ethanol (98%). The solvents were removed by means of rotary evaporator.

Mosquito Rearing

Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes were reared at the insectory of the National Malaria Centre, Sinnar State, Sudan, using the method described by Zarroug et al. (1988).

Bioassay

Tests on larvae

Twenty percent solutions from each of ethanol and hexane extracts were prepared using tap water. Serial dilutions were made to give the concentrations of 500, 1000, 3000, 5000, and 10000 mgℓ-1 in a final volume of one liter each. Water and solvents controls were prepared with the same final volumes, and all treatments were replicated four times. These treatments were then evaluated for mosquito larvicidal activity according to the method of WHO (1969). A group of third stage larvae of Anopheles arabiensis (twenty larvae) were placed in exposure bowls. The exposure period was 24 hours, during which no food was offered to the larvae. Mortality was recorded by counting the completely dead or moribund larvae together with the larvae that failed to reach the surface of the solution. Then data recorded was subjected to probit analysis using MSTAT-C package computer program (1991), to calculate LC50 values.

Tests on adult

The method adopted was the excito-repellency test recommended by the WHO (1979). Solutions of 20% from each of the ethanol and hexane extracts were prepared, and dilutions were made to form concentrations of 1%, 5%, and 10% in a final volume of 50 ml. These volumes of each concentration were poured on five filter papers (24 cm diameter) until wetting, and then were

 

 
   


Effect of Some Neem Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes

embedded in the internal part of the main box. Two petri dishes lined with a piece of wetted cotton and covered with filter paper were prepared; one was placed in the main box and the other in the trap box to serve as an egg laying sites. All treatments were replicated three times with water and solvents controls for comparison.

Fifty gravid A. arabiensis mosquitoes were then released inside the main box. Ovipositon activity index (OAI) was determined after 24 hours using the formula of Kramer and Mulla (1979) viz. OAI= (Nt-Nc)/ (Nt+Nc). Where OAI= oviposition activity index, Nt= number of eggs in the treatment and Nc= number of eggs in the control. OAI values +1 indicate an attractive effect, while OAI values -1 indicate deterrency activity of the material tested. Adult mortality was recorded after 24 hours and presented in percentage.

Results and Discussion

Results given in Table (1) demonstrated the crude hexane and ethanol neem extracts (leaves and seed kernels) at different concentrations depicted larvicideal effect against Anopheles arabiensis mosquito. These results agreed with Aliero (2003), who suggested that seed oil and leaf extract of neem Azadirachta indica had properties that could be developed and used in the control of Anopheles mosquitoes in the tropics. Moreover, it was observed that better mortality results were obtained by the neem seed kernel extract compared to neem leaves extract. The advantages of seeds over leaves was also confirmed by Grunwald et al. (1992), who concluded that the bioactive compounds in the neem were found throughout the tree, but those in the seed kernel were the most concentrated and accessible. Likewise, Aliero (2003) concluded that seed oil appeared as the most lethal among various parts tested against Anopheles spp. He attributed this to deficiency of dissolved oxygen in the water. Further, it was also observed that neem seed hexane extract exerted better mortality when compared to ethanol. Regarding this manner, hexane solvent was well known to remove the oil from the seed (non-polar), and this oil was an interesting material that could be used to kill eggs, larvae and adults of certain pests.

Table (2) showed results of probit regression analysis which demonstrated the LC50 of different plant extracts. It depicted the same trend of the mortality results in table (1), when the neem hexane extracts of the tested parts exerted lower LC50. However the seed extract was the best treatment compared to the other ones, with LC50 of 1998 mgℓ-1.

The  negative  results  of  Oviposition  Activity  Index  (OAI)  presented  in  Table  (3)

Demonstrated that the different neem part organic extracts with their different concentrations, had the ability to deter Anopheles arabiensisadult from laying eggs. This result is agreed with Schmutterer (1990), who reported that neem based pesticides containing azadirachtin which is a

 

 
   


Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 2, NO. 1 (2017) 24 - 34

 

predominant active ingredient, having antifeedant, ovipositional deterrence repellency, and growth disruption against insects. Goektepe et al. (2004) confirmed the previous conclusions and continued reporting that they are relatively safe towards non-target biota, with minimum risk of direct adverse effects and contamination of water bodies. However, “Neem Aura”, a commercial botanical product containing neem ingredients, was proved to be highly effective oviposition deterrent to Aedes albopictus, it reduced oviposition by 76% (Xue et al., 2001).

Adult mortality presented in Table (3) revealed that lower mortality percentages were induced by different tested parts when applied as paper impregnation. This result agreed with that of Sagar and Segal (1996) who stated that, though neem products show high larvicidal activity, they do not show adulticidal action. However, Khan and Ahmed (2000) revealed the toxicity of crude neem extract and commercial eucalyptus against the adult housefly Musca domestica when measured as topical application. From the result of oviposition deterrency, it could be assumed that while neem extract had the ability to deter adult from laying eggs, the mosquito make little or no contact with the treated surface, and consequently mosquito intoxication does not occur.

Conclusion

This study clearly demonstrated that ethanol and hexane extracts of neem leaves and seed kernels exhibited larvicidal effect on Anopheles arabiensis mosquito, with the superiority of the seed hexane extract. However, oviposition deterrency properties were observed from all concentrations of the tested extracts, with negligible toxicity towards adult mosquitoes. The obtained results, after further field evaluation, will encourage the inclusion of these extracts in IPM programs for mosquito control with other natural and biological measures.

 

References

 

Aliero, B.L. (2003). Larvicidal activity of aqueous extracts of Azadirachta indica on the larvae of Anopheles mosquito. African J. biotechnology, 2: 325-327.

Batra, C.P.; Mittal, P.K.; Adak, T. and Sharma, V.P. (1998). Efficacy of neem water emulsion against mosquito immatures. Indian Journal of Malariology, 35: 15.

Elsiddig, F.I. (2007). Effect of neem, cafure, and rehan organic extracts compared to other chemical and biological standard insecticides on Anopheles arabiensis Patton Mosquito. Ph.D. Thesis, Sudan University of Science and Technology, 158pp.

 

 
   


Effect of Some Neem Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes

Elsiddig, F.I. (2009). Effect of different preparations from neem tree on Microtermes thoracalis Sjost. Infesting ground nuts. Journal of Agro-estimation Scientific Agency (Gagresca), Vol. (1): 84-95.

Goektepe, I.; Portier, R. and Ahmedna, M. (2004). Ecological risk assessment of neem based pesticides. J. Env. Sci. Hlth. B. 39: 311-320.

Grunwald, J.; Boschitz, C. and Claudia, E. (1992). Possibilities of vector control. Proceedings of the first workshop on the use and production of neem ingredients, Wetzlar-Germany, 91-93.

Kamau, L. and Valule, J.M. (2006). Status of insecticidal susceptibility in Anopheles arabiensis

from Mwea rice irrigation scheme, central Kenya. Malaria Journal, 5: 46-49.

 

Khan, M.F., and Ahmed, S.M. (2000). Toxicity of crude neem leaf extract against housefly

Muscadomistica L. adult as compared with DDVP, Dichlorvis. Turk. J. Zool., 4: 219-233.

 

Kramer, W.L. and Mulla, M.S. (1979). Oviposition attractants and repellents of mosquitoes: Oviposition response of culex mosquitoes to organic infusions. Environmental Entomology 8:1111-1117

Kristan, M. (2003). Pyrethroid resistance/ susceptibility and differential urban/rural distribution of Anopheles arabiensisand Anopheles gambiae malaria vectors in Nigeria and Ghana. Med. Vet. Entomology, 17: 326-332.

Mabaso, M.L.; Sharp, B. and Lengeler, C. (2004). Historical review of malaria control in southern Africa with emphasis on the use of indoor residual house spraying. Tropical Med. Int. Health, 9: 846-856.

Maharaj, A.; Mathembu, D.J. and Sharp, B.L. (2005). Impact of DDT re-introduction on malaria transmission in Kwazulu, Natal. South Africa Medical Journal, 95: 871-874.

Mansour, M.H. and Salem, H.A. (2001). Efficiency of two neem formulations in controlling pallid scale Insulaspispalidula Green, infesting mango trees in Egypt. Workshop on "practice oriented results on use of plant extracts and pheromones in integrated and biological pest control". Cairo-Egypt, 39-40.

Markouk, M.; Bekkouche, K.; Larhsini, M.; Bousaid, M.H.; Lazrek, B. and Jana, M.(2000). Evaluation of some Moroccan medicinal plant extracts for larvicidal activity. Journal of Ethnopharmaco l73: 293–297.

 

 
   


Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 2, NO. 1 (2017) 24 - 34

 

Moore, S.A.; Lenglet, A. and Hill, N. (2003). Field evaluation of three plants based insect repellents against malaria vectors in province of Bollivian Amazon. Journal of American Mosquito Control Association, 9: 202-215.

MSTAT-C (1991). A software program for the design, management and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan University, USA.

Nathan, S.S; Kalaivani, K. and Murugan, K. (2005). Effect of neem limonoids on the malaria vector Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae). Acta Tropica, 96 (1) 47-55.

Sagar, S.K. and Segal, S.S. (1996). Effect of aqueous extracts of de-oiled neem (Azadirachtaindica) seed kernel and koranja (Pongamiaglobera) seed kernel against Culexquinquefascaitus. Journal of Community Dis., 28: 260-266.

Sati, A.A; Bashir, N.H.H.; Elkhidir, E. and Nasr, O.E. (2003). Effect of neem seed Kernel and "handal'' extract on muskmelon pests complex. University of Khartoum Journal of Agricultural sciences, 11: 40-58.

Schmutterer, H. (1990). Properties and potentials of natural pesticides from neem tree

Azadirachtaindica. Ann. Rev. Entomology. 35: 271-297.

 

WHO, (1969). Insecticidal resistance and vector control. Tenth Report of the World Health Organization Expert Committee on Insecticides, No. 191, 98 pp. Swiss Land, Geneva

WHO, (1979). Safe use of Pesticides. Third Report of the Expert Committee on Vector Biology and Control, Technical Report No. 634, pp 18-23. Swiss land, Geneva.

Xue, R.D.; Barnard, D.R. and Ali, A. (2001). Laboratory and field evaluation of insect repellents as oviposition deterrents against the mosquito Aedesalbopictus. Med. Vet. Entomol., 15: 126-131.

Yang, P. and Ma, Y. (2005). Repellency effect of plant essential oils against Aedesalbopictus.

Journal of Vector Ecology 30: 231-234.

 

Zarroug,  I.M.A.;  Nogud,  A.D.;  Bashir,  A.K.    and Mageed, A.A. (1988). Malaria vectors.

International Journal of Crude Drug Research 26:77-80.

 

 
   

 

Concentration (mgℓ-1)

500

1000

3000

5000

10000

Neem Leaves Ethanol Extract (NLE)

Mortality %

7.5

10

15

16.25

67.5

S.E (±)

0.22

0.0

0.35

0.22

0.50

 

Neem Leaves Hexane Extract (NLH)

Mortality %

11.25

18.75

55

61.25

92.5

S.E (±)

0.65

0.41

0.87

1.14

0.83

 

Neem Seeds Ethanol Extract (NSE)

Mortality %

5

12.5

25

81.25

100

S.E (±)

0.35

0.56

0.0

0.54

0.0

 

Neem Seeds Hexane Extract (NSH)

Mortality %

5

25

93.75

98.75

100

S.E (±)

0.35

0.0

0.41

0.22

0.0

 

Water control

 

Solvent control

 

 

Mortality%

0.00

 

0.00

 

 

S.E (±)

0.00

 

0.00

 

 

 

 

Effect of Some Neem Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes

Table 1: Mortality percentage caused by different neem organic extracts to Anopheles arabiensis larvae.

 

 

Table 2: Probit regression line parameters of response of Anopheles arabiensis larvae to different neem organic extracts.

 

Ethanol

Hexane

Ethanol

Hexane

Intercept

0.7817

1.5278

4.7710

8.0276

Variance of slope

0.0360

0.0288

0.0533

0.1215

Slope

1.446

1.907

2.816

4.154

Chi-square

28.999

23.742

47.825

10.158

Probability

0.0483

0.1636

0.0001

0.9266

Degrees of freedom

18

18

18

18

Logarithm LC50

3.9181

3.6090

3.4694

3.3005

Variance of logarithm LC50

0.0059

0.0001

0.0008

0.0008

LC50 ( mgℓ-1)

8282

4065

3380

1998

 

 

Parameter                       Leaves extract                    Seeds extract         

 


Fathelrahman Ibrahim Elsiddig / Nile Journal for Agricultural Sciences Vol. 2, NO. 1 (2017) 24 - 34

 

Table 3: Oviposition deterrency and adult mortality of Anopheles arabiensis resulting from different neem extracts.

 

 

Mean No.                 Oviposition activity

Attractancy or        Adult

 

 

of eggs

 

index

deterrency

(%)

NLE

1%

29.67

4.16

-0.7308

Deterrency

00.00

5%

 

17.33

2.08

-0.8344

''

00.00

10%

 

15.00

0.00

-0.8551

''

02.00

NLH

1%

55.67

0.58

-0.4339

Deterrency

00.00

5%

 

08.33

3.51

-0.8884

''

00.00

10%

 

00.00

0.00

-1.0000

''

04.67

NSE

1%

48.00

1.00

-0.6000

Deterrency

00.00

5%

 

23.67

1.18

-0.7790

"

03.33

10%

 

13.67

2.08

-0.8671

"

07.33

NSH

1%

33.33

1.15

-0.6176

Deterrency

02.67

5%

 

33.33

0.58

-0.6176

"

15.33

10%

 

00.00

0.00

-1.0000

"

26.00

 

 

Treatment

 

S.D

 

mortality

 

 

 

 

NLE= Neem Leaves Ethanol Extract NLH= Neem Leaves Hexane Extract NSE= Neem Seed Ethanol Extract NSH= Neem Seed Hexane Extract OAI= Oviposition Activity Index S.D= Standard Deviation

S.E= Standard Error

WHO= World Health Organization IPM= Integrated Pest Management LC= Lethal Concentration

 

 
Effect of Some Neem Organic Extracts Against Mosquitoes